Jerash for Research and Studies Journal مجلة جرش للبحوث والدراسات
![Jerash for Research and Studies Journal مجلة جرش للبحوث والدراسات](/assets/md5images/435d232082cfd081b39c2fab919932ec.png)
Abstract
The present research aims at elucidation the authenticity of the concept of violation in the formation of judicial rules being a way of proving it. This stems from the hypothesis that meaning of words are their denotations , some of which are agreed upon such as utterance meaning , whereas others are not such as conceptual meaning . That is , the concept of violation and disagreement on its authenticity is common in the judicial classifications , scientific writings , legal texts , people's manners of saying or the contracts they conduct one of them is al - shafi ' and one example of this violation is what introduced AL - Akfash , Ibn - fares , Ibn - jiny . But the dispute is over its authenticity in the Quranic texts and sunnat. In this regard, people are divided into two parties. One party finds it reliable; this party is represented by Maliki, Shafi and Hanbali. The other party, represented by Hanafi, finds it a corrupt induction. This paper is a modest attempt to survey the opinions and evidence of each party
Recommended Citation
Al-Ali, Muhammad
(2007)
"Argumentation of the Concept of Contravention between Fixers and Negators,"
Jerash for Research and Studies Journal مجلة جرش للبحوث والدراسات: Vol. 8:
Iss.
1, Article 5.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/jpu/vol8/iss1/5