"ملامح الاختلاف المنهجي بين علماء الحديث والسيرة والتاريخ Applications on the Argument of Analogy in the Shafi’i School of Thought" by Mohammed Hamad Al-Gharaybeh and Zain Al Abideen mohammad Baqer

Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies

Article Title

ملامح الاختلاف المنهجي بين علماء الحديث والسيرة والتاريخ Applications on the Argument of Analogy in the Shafi’i School of Thought

Authors

Mohammed Hamad Al-Gharaybeh, The World Islamic Sciences UniversityFollow
Zain Al Abideen mohammad Baqer, -

Abstract

This study is identified with deduction by analogy. The majority of legal knowledge scientists from different Islamic sectors have taken it as a foundation.Shafaee relayed on deduction analogy in giving jugements in many legal knowledge questions.The study mentioned examples of worships, marriages, crimes, oaths and vaws.

Recommended Citation

Al-Gharaybeh, Mohammed Hamad and Baqer, Zain Al Abideen mohammad (2018) "ملامح الاختلاف المنهجي بين علماء الحديث والسيرة والتاريخ Applications on the Argument of Analogy in the Shafi’i School of Thought," Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies: Vol. 14: Iss. 2, Article 10.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/jois/vol14/iss2/10

Download

Included in

Islamic Studies Commons

COinS