The research aims to study the accusation in financial transactions contracts, especially transactions conducted by the representative for the purpose of developing money and profit, and show the matters that affecting the actions of the representative, and its relationship to justice and types of charge that limit the risk of prosecution. The modern research included the nature of the accusation and its relation to certain terms such as favoritism and deception, then talk about the types of charges and their relation to the representative and the transactions, and the most important means that reduce the subsequent charge in the representation contracts.
To achieve the objectives of the research and the appropriateness of its content, the research followed the analytical descriptive method, including the methods of induction and extrapolation. The research found several results, which can be summed up: that the effect of the charge in the treatment of the representative is linked to the strength of the accusation and its weakness, and the strong charge prevents the existence of the justice requirement in the representative in advance, in addition to the intention of the requirement of the jurists multiple contractor in some forms of transactions, To prevent the representative from acting because of the strength of the charge.
Al-Ali, Saleh Ahmeed
"The Accusation in Financial Transaction Contracts,"
Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies: Vol. 15
, Article 3.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/jois/vol15/iss3/3