This study examines the theory of the “responsibility to protect’, which is the last stage of evolution in the “theory of humanitarian intervention “ , or a new version, which entered the international law after the Earth Summit in This theory has evolved after the urgent need for intervention in many .2005 conflicts, where heinous crimes and human rights abuses were committed. There were many cases of interfering in many conflicts to protect human rights, however, some countries, in many cases, intervened to achieve the goals, objectives, and interests of its own, without being concerned with the protection of human rights, so the effects of the intervention in some disputes were worse than no intervention. From here, the study examined the theory of the “ responsibility to protect” in three parts, the first is related to the stages of its development, the second | in the content of the theory and the legal grounds upon which, and the third which was related to its legitimacy as a prelude to talk about the evaluation and its criticism
"The Legal System of Responsibility to Protect as a New Form of Humanitarian Military Intervention,"
Jerash for Research and Studies Journal مجلة جرش للبحوث والدراسات: Vol. 16:
2, Article 2.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/jpu/vol16/iss2/2