•  
  •  
 
An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities)

Abstract

The judgment issued by the constitutional court shall be final can't be challenged in any way.The constitutional court shall be entitled to absolute jurisdiction in the face of all powers and all of the original and the court's ruling shall apply directly unless it specifies another date for its validity.The problematic nature of the study is highlighted in several points the most important of which is: the lack of clarity of the position of the constitutional court on the nature of sentences and scope of the direction of the whole, as this problem arises in not specifying to what extent the effect of the sentence.So as to be limited only to the provider of payment or can benefit from others and to answer these problems have been asked many questions, the most important: is the absolute extension of the absolute ruling of the constitutional laws suit to respond to the appeal of the absence of interest or class?Dose the ruling in the constitutional case applies directly to the imam or revert to the past?The purpose of this study is to clarify the scope of authoritative judgment in the constitutional case and the time scale for their implementation from the point of view of the Jordanian legislator because of its impact on the stability of rights and legal centers. The importance of this study is highlighted by the lack of judicial rulings issued by the Jordanian constitutional court in this matter, and this was reflected in the statement of theposition of the court form the scope of the courts judgments and extent to which the effects of the judgment can be extended. The descriptive and analytical methods were adopted in this study.Through the identification of the concepts involved in the study and analysis of the constitutional texts and legal and jurisprudence related to the subject matter of the study.The study concluded with a number of results, the most important of which is that the legislative texts which determine the absolute authenticity of the judgment rendered in the constitutional case have been absolute and general.It also concluded by highlighting certain recommendations in the most important of which is the need to clarify the final idea of the ruling issued by the constitutional court and to limit it only to the ruling on the unconstitutionality of the legislative text.

Share

COinS