Abstract
Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare program compatibility for dental operators between different in office clear aligners software: (3D Maestro,3shape, BlueSky bio, Plainmeca). Materials and methods: 4 in office clear aligners software: (3D Maestro,3shape, BlueSky bio, Plainmeca) were used. Ten orthodontists were recruited for the evaluation process, A total of 48 casts were used including upper and lower arches for each case. Each orthodontist made a check mark on each option in the pre-made scoring template.A check mark with YES was given a One point, and a check mark with NO was given Zero point. Results: This study revealed no statistically significant difference between the tested software regarding the first and second questions that were concerned with achieving the aims of the software and their reliability. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in tools and options regarding the software, The BlueSky bio showed easiness in manipulation and work flow due to arrangement of tools and options. Romexis 3D Ortho Studio has shown the highest results, indicating it was the most time consuming among the tested software., Maestro 3D Dental Studio order management was the most complex among the tested software, There was no statistically significant difference between the tested software regarding the first and second questions that were concerned with achieving the aims of the software and their reliability.
Recommended Citation
Hammam KI, NASSEF E, AL DAWLTALY M. Comparing Program Compatibility for Dental Operators between Different In-office Clear Aligners Software. Future Dental Journal. 2024; 9(2):111-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.9027.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.9027
COinS