"ضوابط المسائل المخالفة لما اتفقت عليه المذاهب الأربعة - دراسة تطبيقية Measures of the Issues Contrary to what the Four Schools of Thought Agreed upon - An Applied Study" by Oqab Hassan Al-Shadida and Jamila Abdul Qadir Al-Rifai

Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies

Article Title

ضوابط المسائل المخالفة لما اتفقت عليه المذاهب الأربعة - دراسة تطبيقية Measures of the Issues Contrary to what the Four Schools of Thought Agreed upon - An Applied Study

Authors

Oqab Hassan Al-Shadida, -Follow
Jamila Abdul Qadir Al-Rifai, Jordan University

Abstract

This study deals with the rooting of dealing with the schools in Islamic jurisprudence as an applied study, and showing the importance of giving the Sharia rulings the peremptory character. It has been found that the rulings that have been proven are not changed with the changing times and conditions and with the evolution of the times. These issues need further research and rooting in Islamic jurisprudence, And the study confirms the prevention of the issues that govern the affairs of the muslim community, such as the succession of women to the presidency of the state, and equality of men in inheritance, and equality of the muslim in the amount of Diya, which allowed some researchers on the basis of arguments short of governance.

Recommended Citation

Al-Shadida, Oqab Hassan and Al-Rifai, Jamila Abdul Qadir (2018) "ضوابط المسائل المخالفة لما اتفقت عليه المذاهب الأربعة - دراسة تطبيقية Measures of the Issues Contrary to what the Four Schools of Thought Agreed upon - An Applied Study," Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies: Vol. 14: Iss. 3, Article 16.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/jois/vol14/iss3/16

Download

Included in

Islamic Studies Commons

COinS