Review process for papers
Double Blind Peer Review
JGUAA2 pays great attention to the role of peer review. Reviewers evaluate the article upon Originality, Methodology, Bibliography; both print and digital, Language and the extent to which subjects of the paper are harmonic with one another and Results.
1- After receiving electronic version of the research turned to two pier- reviewers specialized in the research's topic at least one is from outside the Journal’s community (Faculty, Editorial board, and advisory board).
2- The Author receives the modification of the reviewers: Elements of Evaluation, the paper and the attached report, (if applicable).
3- If the reviewers replied by accepting, the paper is accepted for publication. and letter of acceptance is extracted in English.
4- In case of refusing the research, it will be sent to a third pier-reviewer. His opinion will finally confirm if the research is acceptable for the publication or no. provided that the process of academic reviewing is to be a binary anonymous one, without the author’s name upon submitting the article for reviewing
5- In case of required correction from the peer-reviewer, the research is sent to the author to do all modification, then it will be sent again to the pier-reviewer and editors, to be sure that all correction have been done.
6-If the reviewers replied by refusing, the paper will be rejected without a refund of the reviewing fees.
7- Then the journal's editors shall revise, prepare and edit the research following the Standard criteria.